The Uninspired

Lao Tzu was a philosopher and spiritual leader in Chinese culture. His ancient Chinese name meant “old master” and he was the writer of Tao Te Ching and is credited as a leading organizer of Taoism. In this writing, Tzu gives advice on integrity, behavior, and how to walk in “the way.” However, Tao Te Ching gives the impression that Lao Tzu had been convinced on starting a revolution without a cause. Throughout the language he used, I find that Tzu is extremely passive, uninspired, and negative in his views.

            The first specific example from the text showing that Tzu was uninspired is when he states that a true sage “takes no action” and “uses no words.” This shows that he has no intention in becoming active in his beliefs and that if given the opportunity to share his thoughts in a spiritual confrontation that he would be the first to back down and say nothing. As stated in chapter thirty, Lao Tzu did not approve of war and therefore he did not feel strongly enough about defending his beliefs by a “show of arms.” To use an act of violence was known as “not walking in the way” according to his beliefs.  A good cause is worth fighting for, either in violence or non-violence protesting, which even a non-violent protest would take an argument of some sort.

            In chapter sixteen, Tzu discusses the importance of obtaining stillness and emptiness for the reason that we all return to our own roots or “destiny.” This is a very controversial statement, because essentially the decisions we make can change our destiny. Many philosophers believe in contrast that we make our own destiny. This idea of predestination vs. free will has also been disputed by Christian theologians for years. Studies show that almost twice as many Christians adopt the belief of free will over that of predestination (Melton 12).  Lao Tzu believes that we just simply live life and walk throughout it in emptiness, which seems very pessimistic. Almost as if he is saying that we should not strive for anything but to be content with stoicism and hopelessness.

            Also, there is an underlying feel that Tzu lacks emotion in Tao Te Ching. His passiveness seems as more of a long-term personality disorder than just a brief pessimistic phase. He believes that by doing nothing, you are protecting yourself from failure because he says if you “discard profit than there will be no more thieves” and various similar statements are found sporadically placed throughout. Keith Ward, who majored in religion and spirituality, stated “In completion of Tao Te Ching the reader will be emotionally void and inspired to do nothing” (Gifford Lecture Series).

            In conclusion, Lao Tzu kept a perfect balance of emotions to the point of mediocrity and a boring lifestyle. At times he was not beyond negativity. To make a difference in the lives of others, encouragement, optimism, and happiness are much more effective approaches. Though many admire his simplicity, many others argue that Lao Tzu’s passive, uninspired, and negative views have achieved no positive gain in today’s society.